- Home
- Knowledge
- Engineering Insights
- Shielded vs unshielded connectors
Shielded vs unshielded connectors
A shield only improves electromagnetic compatibility when it is continuous from cable to housing to panel, with low impedance at the frequencies that matter. This article explains how foil and braid shields work, what transfer impedance measures, why 360° termination outperforms pigtails, how to approach shield grounding, and when an unshielded connection is the better engineering choice.
- Reading time
- 9 min read
- Technically reviewed
- 11 October 2026
- Document
- Rev. 1
- Level
- Intermediate
Choosing between a shielded and an unshielded connector is not a choice between better and worse. A shield adds cost, diameter, stiffness and assembly steps, and it only delivers when the whole shielding path — cable shield, termination, connector housing, mating interface and panel — is continuous and low in impedance at the frequencies that matter. A shielded cable terminated through a pigtail into an unshielded connector can perform little better than no shield at high frequency. This article explains what a shield does, how cable and connector shields are built and measured, how to terminate and ground them, and when an unshielded connection is the sound choice.
What a shield does, and what it cannot do
Interference couples into and out of cables in three main ways. Capacitive (electric-field) coupling dominates near high-voltage, fast-switching conductors. Inductive (magnetic-field) coupling dominates near conductors carrying large or fast-changing currents, such as motor and welding cables. Radiated coupling becomes significant when cable lengths are comparable to the wavelength — at tens of megahertz and above for typical machine cabling. Coupling also works in reverse: a cable that picks up interference will radiate it, so shielding serves both immunity and emission requirements.
A conductive shield connected to a reference intercepts electric fields well, even at low frequencies. Against magnetic fields it works by carrying an induced current that opposes the external field, which requires the shield to be connected at both ends and to be effective at the frequency concerned. At power frequencies, a thin shield gives little magnetic protection; there, twisted pairs and balanced circuits do most of the work, because the induced voltages in the two conductors largely cancel. Shielding and balanced transmission are therefore complementary measures, not alternatives.
- Shield (screen)
- A conductive layer around one or more conductors — foil, braid, spiral wires or a combination — intended to reduce electromagnetic coupling to and from the conductors inside.
- Transfer impedance (Z~T~)
- The ratio of the longitudinal voltage induced on the inside of a shield to the current flowing on its outside, usually per unit length (Ω/m or mΩ/m). Lower is better. It describes the shield itself, independent of the installation.
- Screening attenuation
- The ratio, in dB, between the power fed into the shielded system and the maximum power radiated from it, used at higher frequencies where transfer impedance alone does not describe performance.
- 360° termination
- A connection that contacts the shield around its full circumference and transfers it to the connector housing without an intermediate wire.
Cable shield constructions
The connector can only continue the shield the cable provides, so the cable construction comes first. Most shielded cables use foil, braid or both.
Foil, braid and combined shields
Foil
Aluminium or copper laminated to a polymer film
- Full optical coverage, effective at high frequencies
- Thin, so relatively high resistance and weak at low frequencies
- Usually contacted through a drain wire, which makes 360° termination harder
- Can tear or crack under repeated flexing
Braid
Woven tinned or bare copper strands
- Low DC resistance; good at low and medium frequencies
- Optical coverage below 100 %; apertures let high-frequency fields through
- Robust and well suited to 360° clamping in a connector
- Flex life depends on braid angle and strand size
Foil plus braid
Combined construction
- Broadband performance: braid for low frequencies, foil to close the apertures
- Larger diameter, higher cost and stiffness
- Common for industrial Ethernet, drive and encoder cables
Spiral (served) shields of helically wound wires are flexible and easy to terminate, but behave inductively at high frequency and are mostly used for audio and low-frequency signals. For balanced data cables, the naming convention used with ISO/IEC 11801 describes the construction compactly: the part before the slash is the overall shield, the part after it the shielding of the pairs. U/UTP is fully unshielded, F/UTP has an overall foil, SF/UTP an overall braid and foil, and S/FTP an overall braid with individually foiled pairs.
Transfer impedance and the weakest link
Transfer impedance is the most useful single quantity for comparing shields. At low frequency it approaches the DC resistance of the shield. As frequency rises, a solid tube improves because of the skin effect, whereas a braid eventually gets worse, because magnetic fields leak through its apertures and the woven strands add an inductive component. Datasheets of high-quality cables and connectors may state transfer impedance or screening attenuation as a function of frequency; where they do, compare them at the frequencies of the actual interference, not at a single headline point.
For cables, surface transfer impedance is commonly measured with the triaxial method of IEC 62153-4-3. For mated connectors — including the cable-to-connector transition — and for cable assemblies, IEC 62153-4-7 defines the triaxial tube-in-tube method for transfer impedance, screening attenuation and coupling attenuation. The existence of a dedicated connector method reflects a practical reality: in a shielded link, the connector and its termination are usually the weakest part. A cable with excellent shielding over its length can be undermined by a few centimetres of poorly terminated shield at each end.
Shield termination: 360° versus pigtail
A shielded connector has to make three low-impedance transitions: from cable shield to connector housing, from housing to mating housing, and from the fixed connector to the panel or enclosure. Each transition should be circumferential.
- 01Cable to housing: the braid is folded back over a cone or ferrule and clamped, crimped or pressed by spring elements so that it contacts the metal housing all the way round. Foil shields are normally combined with a braid or a drain wire; where only a drain wire exists, the foil must still be brought into the clamping zone.
- 02Housing to housing: metal or metallised housings, shield springs or contact fingers ensure continuity across the mating interface. The coupling nut alone, if it is free to rotate and not in defined contact, is not a reliable shield path.
- 03Housing to panel: a conductive flange, EMC gasket or serrated contact on an unpainted, conductive surface. Paint, anodising and powder coating are insulators at the joint.
A pigtail — the shield twisted into a wire and connected to a pin or a screw — replaces a circumferential connection with a short inductance. At low frequency this hardly matters. At high frequency the pigtail's reactance can dominate the whole shield path, and shield current concentrated in the pigtail produces a local magnetic field that couples directly onto the inner conductors. The gap where the conductors leave the shield acts as an unshielded section.
Where a connector series offers only a shield pin, that pin is still better than no connection, but the wire to it should be as short as possible and the shield should be opened over the shortest possible length. For demanding EMC requirements, select a series that offers a 360° shield clamp as a design feature rather than adapting an unshielded design.
Grounding the shield: one end or both?
Few connectivity questions produce more debate. The answer depends on the frequency of the interference and on the potential differences in the installation.
| Approach | Effect | Typically used for | Caveat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Both ends, 360° | Shield carries induced currents; effective against magnetic and high-frequency fields | Digital data, fieldbus, industrial Ethernet, motor and drive cables, most modern machine wiring | Low-frequency potential differences drive current through the shield; an equipotential bonding conductor in parallel reduces it |
| One end only | Blocks electric-field coupling; no shield loop current at low frequency | Low-level analogue signals and audio in installations with significant earth potential differences | Ineffective against magnetic fields; the open end behaves as an antenna at high frequency |
| One end direct, other end via capacitor | Both ends connected at high frequency, one end open at power frequency | Compromise where low-frequency ground loops and high-frequency interference coexist | Capacitor must be rated for the voltages present and mounted with very short connections |
General practice. The equipment manufacturer's installation guidelines and the applicable fieldbus or network installation rules take precedence. IEC TR 61000-5-2 gives guidance on earthing and cabling for EMC.
In machinery and automation, connecting shields at both ends with 360° terminations, combined with a well-meshed equipotential bonding system, is the prevailing practice, because most interference sources — drives, switched-mode supplies, fast logic — are high-frequency. One-end grounding remains a valid tool for specific low-frequency analogue problems. In either case, the shield is not a substitute for the protective earth conductor and should not be used as a signal return unless the interface is designed that way, as in coaxial connections.
When to choose shielded or unshielded
| Situation | Usual choice | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Motor cable from a variable-frequency drive | Shielded, 360° at both ends | Fast switching edges cause strong emissions; drive manufacturers typically require shielded motor cables |
| Industrial Ethernet or fieldbus near drives and power cabling | Shielded | High data rates with limited noise margin in a high-interference environment |
| Low-level analogue sensor signal (thermocouple, strain gauge, mV range) | Shielded, grounding chosen per installation | Small signals are sensitive to capacitive coupling |
| Digital switching signals inside a control cabinet with good segregation | Often unshielded | Large noise margin, short runs; segregation from power wiring does most of the work |
| Balanced Ethernet in an office-like environment | Often unshielded (U/UTP) | Pair balance gives adequate immunity at lower cost and diameter |
| Mains power to a resistive or conventionally powered load | Usually unshielded | No high-frequency content to contain |
| RF and high-frequency signals | Coaxial or other controlled-impedance shielded interface | The shield is part of the transmission line itself |
Starting points only. The EMC requirements of the end product — in the EU, the essential requirements of Directive 2014/30/EU and the harmonised standards applied — decide.
Unshielded connections have genuine advantages: smaller and more flexible cables, simpler and cheaper termination, no ground-loop paths, and fewer failure points on moving machinery. Where balanced transmission, segregation from noisy wiring and filtering at the equipment boundary already achieve the required margin, adding a shield brings cost without benefit. Conversely, where a shield is needed, a half-implemented one gives a false sense of security.
Many common interfaces exist in both versions — shielded and unshielded M12 variants, shielded RJ45 and D-Sub connectors with metal hoods — so the decision is usually made per link rather than per product family. Shielded connector types can be explored in the catalogue via shielded connectors; for complete links, shield termination is one of the details best settled in a cable assembly design. Related topics are covered in how to select an industrial connector and RF connector selection and signal integrity.
Key takeaways
- 01A shield works only as a continuous, low-impedance path from cable through connector housing to panel; the connector and its termination are usually the weakest point.
- 02Foil is effective at high frequency, braid at low to medium frequency; combined constructions cover both.
- 03Transfer impedance describes a shield's quality; IEC 62153-4-3 covers cables and IEC 62153-4-7 mated connectors and assemblies.
- 04Terminate shields 360° wherever possible; a pigtail adds inductance that dominates at high frequency.
- 05Grounding at both ends with equipotential bonding is the usual practice for high-frequency interference; one-end grounding is a specific remedy for low-frequency analogue problems.
- 06Unshielded, balanced connections are often the right choice where segregation and pair balance provide sufficient margin.
References
- [1]IEC 62153-4-7:2021+AMD1:2025 CSV — Metallic cables and other passive components test methods — Part 4-7: Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) — Test method for measuring of transfer impedance ZT and screening attenuation aS or coupling attenuation aC of connectors and assemblies — Triaxial tube in tube method — International Electrotechnical CommissionMeasurement of shielding performance of mated connectors and cable assemblies.
- [2]IEC 62153-4-3 — Metallic communication cable test methods — Part 4-3: Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) — Surface transfer impedance — Triaxial method — International Electrotechnical CommissionMeasurement of the surface transfer impedance of cable shields.
- [3]IEC TR 61000-5-2:1997 — Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) — Part 5: Installation and mitigation guidelines — Section 2: Earthing and cabling — International Electrotechnical CommissionGuidance on earthing, bonding and cabling practice for EMC.
- [4]Directive 2014/30/EU on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to electromagnetic compatibility (recast) — European Union (EUR-Lex)EU legal framework for the EMC of equipment.
- [5]ISO/IEC 11801-1 — Information technology — Generic cabling for customer premises — Part 1: General requirements — ISO/IEC JTC 1Source of the balanced-cable shield designations (U/UTP, F/UTP, S/FTP and similar).
Related knowledge
Solution directions
Applications
In the catalogue
Apply it to your design
Need help applying this?
Send your requirements, drawing or part number. A Belko specialist reviews it with this article as context.